| Pages: [1] |
1. Remove Anoms From Null sec, Change them into Remote Concord Missions... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Post got to long. This is also to save the fact, That wormholes can't be argued here. The RISK > Investment > Reward is to high to compare to either Null/High-Sec PvE. This is strickly comparing ANOMS. No DED Sites (Exploration). To the ...
- by Rejuice K - at 2015.03.10 14:29:41
|
2. Remove Anoms From Null sec, Change them into Remote Concord Missions... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Promiscuous Medusa wrote: Rejuice K wrote: Promiscuous Medusa wrote: Dont stay in one system then ffs! Its already too easy to make ISK in nul unless youre just cowering in a corner. I'm not even taking into account running small gangs i...
- by Rejuice K - at 2015.03.10 14:27:46
|
3. Remove Anoms From Null sec, Change them into Remote Concord Missions... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Baali Tekitsu wrote: Rejuice K wrote: Baali Tekitsu wrote: [quote=Rejuice K] I see your point, Even if it is very biased and skewed. Null Powers would enjoy consolidating their power base. However, They've already done that, **Staging ...
- by Rejuice K - at 2015.03.06 18:34:54
|
4. Remove Anoms From Null sec, Change them into Remote Concord Missions... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Baali Tekitsu wrote: [quote=Rejuice K] I see your point, Even if it is very biased and skewed. Null Powers would enjoy consolidating their power base. However, They've already done that, **Staging Systems**. A change like this would allow t...
- by Rejuice K - at 2015.03.06 18:15:00
|
5. Remove Anoms From Null sec, Change them into Remote Concord Missions... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Promiscuous Medusa wrote: Dont stay in one system then ffs! Its already too easy to make ISK in nul unless youre just cowering in a corner. I'm not even taking into account running small gangs into WHs and clearing out sites in there. Stop bei...
- by Rejuice K - at 2015.03.06 18:09:22
|
6. Remove Anoms From Null sec, Change them into Remote Concord Missions... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Baali Tekitsu wrote: Hairpins Blueprint wrote: Baali Tekitsu wrote: The Idea is somewhat good, the reasoning behind it is bad. What null empires want is ideally to be able to cram all their pilots into one system all the time to achieve m...
- by Rejuice K - at 2015.03.06 12:55:14
|
7. Sov Re-Design - Occupancy Sov and the Entosis link - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I like the idea for Supers/Titans. The docking is a little odd, But I understand what you're going for. Maybe some time of larger addition to an outpost to facilitate the docking? Dreads are almost as big as the current docking areas. So a super...
- by Rejuice K - at 2015.03.06 12:47:05
|
8. Remove Anoms From Null sec, Change them into Remote Concord Missions... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Helios Panala wrote: Some sort of pseudo-agent solution maybe? Outposts could be able to hire NPCs who will reward clearing anoms/mining rocks with the location of new hidden anoms/ore sites. Run anom, tell npc you've just run anom, he points ...
- by Rejuice K - at 2015.03.05 14:13:23
|
9. Sov Re-Design - Occupancy Sov and the Entosis link - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
So. First! Now to business, This is I feel really organized and well thought out. I like CCP has decided to fix sov. It needs it, However, I also agree the Entosis Module. While I see a place for it. Isn't the way to fix it. This however; This s...
- by Rejuice K - at 2015.03.05 13:44:02
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |